|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
| |
Q & A |
| |
Index of Topics
What Are Adhesions?
What Causes Adhesions?
How are Adhesions Treated? Diagnosis and Treatment
of Adenomyosis Classification of Endometriosis
Diagnosing Endometriosis
What Causes Endometriosis
Endometriosis of the Intestine (Bowel)
Peritoneal Pockets
Endometriosis of the Lung
Endometriosis and Tampons
Is there any connection between IUD use and endometriosis?
Ovarian Cysts
Uterus Tipped to the Side
Endometriosis, Estrogen Replacement of Cancer
Endometriosis after Pregnancy

Does Endometriosis Increase the
Risk of Miscarriage? 
Can Endometriosis be confused
with PID?
Recurrent Endometriosis After
Hysterectomy
Recurrent Endometriosis After Hysterectomy #2
|
| |
Adhesions
What Are Adhesions?
Question:
My doctor tells me I have extensive adhesions of my pelvic
organs and my intestine. I am in a lot of pain. I have
gone through a couple of surgeries to get rid of the adhesion,
but it seems to keep coming back and if anything the pain
is getting worse. Is there anything that can be done to
help me out?
Answer:
Yes, fortunately your situation can be helped. There are
recent medical advances that make it more likely that
you can permanently get rid of your adhesions and pain.
To answer your question adequately we need to address
several issues. First, what are adhesions? This is part
one of a three part series. Also see part 2"What
Causes Adhesions?" and part 3 "How Are Adhesions
Treated?".
Adhesion is the medical term for scar tissue. Scar tissue
is abnormal tissue that can form during the healing process.
Scar tissue inside the body often connects two parts of
the body that are not suppose to be connected, which can
result in pain. There are three basic types of scar tissue
or adhesions that connect two normal body parts; filmy
adhesions, thick vascular adhesions and dense cohesive
adhesions. Filmy adhesions are similar to spider webs.
There are few blood vessels running through this type
of adhesion. If the surgeon sweeps an instrument through
filmy adhesions, they easily give way. This type of adhesion
usually does not cause pain. Vascular adhesions are thick,
more like string or ropes connecting two organs which
are not suppose to be connected (e.g. the ovary to the
bowel). This type of adhesion can cause pain. Scar tissue
that forms after surgery, usually does so in the first
couple of weeks. Adhesions rarely form months or years
after surgery. However, this type of adhesion can become
progressively shorter over time as it matures. This is
the reason that the pain associated with this type of
adhesion can become progressively worse months following
the surgery. Dense cohesive adhesions connect two pieces
of tissue together tightly, similar to gluing two pieces
of wood together. There is no space in-between the two
pieces of tissue. This can be the worst type of adhesions
to have. This is technically the most difficult to remove
and the most likely to recur after it is removed. The
most common location we see this type of adhesion in gynecology
is between the ovary and the pelvic sidewall. The patient
may experience pain just prior to ovulation when the follicular
cyst forms, tugging on the adhesion. Finally, scar tissue
can be present but not connecting two body parts together.
This is a tough leathery type of tissue. An example is
the thick tissue that can be left after a severe burn.
Inside the body this tissue can cause pain when growing
on the bowel, ureter (the tube from the kidney to the
bladder) and nerves. Remember scar tissue tends to shorten
over time. When it is growing on tissue it will tend to
restrict the normal tissue's movement or constrict the
tissue ever tightening its grip. This can result in abnormal
bowel motility, narrowing of the ureter (causing dilation
upstream and pain, usually mid back), or pressure on a
nerve resulting in pain.
return to top
What Causes Adhesions?
Question:
My doctor tells me I have extensive adhesions of my pelvic
organs and my intestine. I am in a lot of pain. I have
gone through a couple of surgeries to get rid of the adhesion,
but it seems to keep coming back and if anything the pain
is getting worse. Is there anything that can be done to
help me out?
Answer:
Yes, fortunately your situation can be helped. There are
recent medical advances that make it more likely that
you can permanently get rid of your adhesions and pain.
In this section I will discuss the common causes of adhesions.
This is part two of a three part series. Also see part
1"What Are Adhesions?" and part 3 "How
Are Adhesions Treated?".
Scar tissue usually results from previous trauma to the
tissue. The most common causes of scar tissue formation
are endometriosis, past infection, and previous surgery.
Endometriosis is traumatic to the surrounding tissue.
Every month the endometrial implants are stimulated hormonally
and bleed internally when a woman has her period. The
endometrial implant itself and the recurrence bleeding
are very irritating to the inside lining of the body (peritoneum).
The body forms scar tissue is response to endometriosis
in an effort to (1) heal the damaged tissue and (2) wall
off the disease trying to protect the rest of the body.
If you remember our discussion last week, as scar tissue
matures, it shortens. Over time this cycle of irritation
and scar tissue formation results more and more normal
tissue getting pulled into this adhesive mass. Similar
to material pulled up into a curtain pleat. This area
is commonly located on the utero-sacral ligaments and
can involve the uterus, bowel, and vagina. Clinically
the patient may notice pain with periods, lower back pain,
pain with intercourse (deep penetration) and pain with
bowel movements. She may even notice pain radiating down
her leg(s). A special situation that places a patient
at risk of extensive adhesion formation is an endometrioma.
An endometrioma is a collection of endometriosis in the
ovary. If an endometrioma becomes large enough, it can
rupture, spilling its contents into the pelvic cavity.
This substance is very irritating to the body an is a
setup for extensive adhesion formation.
The most common pelvic or abdominal infectious causes
of adhesion formation, are pelvic inflammatory disease
(PID) and appendicitis. PID is an infection of the fallopian
tubes, which is different from the routine vaginal infection.
A patient with PID, usually but not always, has severe
pelvic pain and is often hospitalized for I.V. antibiotics.
Appendicitis does not usually cause pelvic infections.
An uncommon but sever situation that can result in adhesions
is an unrecognized hole in the bowel during surgery. If
a hole is made in the bowel during surgery, not recognized
and left open, the patient can get very sick over the
next week and massive adhesions can result.
By definition, surgery is traumatic to tissue and thus
can result in scar tissue formation. By far and away the
most important factor in preventing post-operative scar
tissue formation is good surgical technique. How the surgeon
handles the tissue is very important. If the tissue is
handled roughly, squeezed tightly with instruments, rubbed
with dry cloths, or coagulated (burned) with electrosurgery,
scar tissue formation is more likely. I will never forget
my first experience in the animal microsurgery laboratory.
I was amazed to watch a piece of tissue I had picked up
with a set of surgical tweezers die off, one of the first
steps in scar tissue formation. All I had done was pick
up the tissue! I learned then that even what seemed to
be normal actions could have devastating results on surgical
outcome.
return to top
How are Adhesions Treated?
Question:
My doctor tells me I have extensive adhesions of my pelvic
organs and my intestine. I am in a lot of pain. I have
gone through a couple of surgeries to get rid of the adhesion,
but it seems to keep coming back and if anything the pain
is getting worse. Is there anything that can be done to
help me out?
Answer:
Yes, fortunately your situation can be helped. There are
recent medical advances that make it more likely that
you can permanently get rid of your adhesions and pain.
To answer your question adequately we need to address
several issues. This is part three of a three part series.
Also see part 1"What Are Adhesions?" and part
2 "What Causes Adhesions?".
Once adhesions are present, there are two crucial aspects
to getting rid of them. The first is removing all of the
adhesions and second is to prevent them from coming back
during the healing process. Adhesions form or reform post-operatively
in the first couple of weeks after surgery. If they are
not there a month after the surgery, they will not reform.
Cutting the adhesions is not adequate treatment. This
would leave scar tissue that can re-adhere to other tissue.
All of the abnormal adhesive tissue should be removed.
In addition, endometriosis is present in scar tissue about
half the time, in patients with endometriosis elsewhere
in the body. The scar tissue is abnormal tissue that should
be removed to allow the remaining normal healthy tissue
to heal properly. The laser laparoscope is particularly
useful in treating thick and/or cohesive adhesions. These
instruments help minimize trauma to the normal tissue.
The leathery type of tissue that squeezes the normal tissue
(see discussion in "Ask Dr. Cook" archive -
What are adhesions?) should be removed as well. Laser
laparoscopy isideal for removing this type of scar tissue.
This approach allows removal of the fibrous scar tissue
while leaving the normal tissue unharmed. As we discussed
last week the single most important factor in preventing
adhesion reformation is good surgical technique.
Having said this, even with good surgical technique, once
scar tissue has formed there is always a chance it reform
after it is removed. Scar tissue forming or re-forming
following surgery is an error in the healing process.
If two structures are touching each other (e.g. the ovary
and the bowel) during the healing process, the body may
mistakenly think that the two structures are one and heal
them as one forming scar tissue around both of them.
Once all of the scar tissue is removed how can we keep
it from coming back? Currently several supportive measures
are available which can used at the completion of surgery.
Probably the most common supportive measure currently
used is Interceed. This is a white mesh like material
which can placed through the laparoscope or at laparotomy.
This mesh acts as a temporary barrier in an attempt to
prevent the surfaces from sticking together during the
healing process and forming adhesions. Eventually this
mesh dissolves and is eliminated from the body. Studies
have shown a reduction in amount and degree of adhesion
formation following surgery, however, real life experience
of some surgeons does not agree with this assessment.
I was involved with some of the initial studies and question
the effectiveness of Interceed. If there is any oozing
(minimal bleeding) it seems that Interceed can even increase
adhesion formation. This is the general impression of
some members of the medical community. While I have used
Interceed in the past, I rarely use it presently.
Gortex Surgical Membrane was the next development in adhesion
prevention. Gortex looks kind of like white plastic paper.
I was involved in the first gynecologic studies at Johns
Hopkins with Dr. John Rock, using it following myomectomy
to prevent adhesion formation. It works well, although
fairly large pieces are needed and they must be sutured
into place. The primary disadvantage of Gortex is that
it is a permanent foreign body, which could increase the
risk of an infection.
Seprafilm is a new product which seems quite effective
in preventing adhesion formation. It looks like wax paper,
but turns into a gel once inside of the body. It dissolves
and is eliminated by the body after about a month. Studies
to date have shown Seprafilm to reduce the number and
extent of adhesions. The results I have seen with Seprafilm
have been amazing. One patient in particular, who had
dense cohesive adhesions in spite of multiple surgeries,
did not have any after placement of Seprafilm. I'm not
saying that it prevents all adhesions, but it does seem
to be the first truly effective absorbable adhesion product
on the market. The primary disadvantage is that it is
virtually impossible to place through the laparoscope.
It is also brittle and fairly difficult to place at laparotomy.
Genzyme, the makers of Seprafilm, are working on Seprafilm
2. This should be easier to place and hopefully can be
placed laparoscopically. A gel form is also under development.
In conclusion, adhesions can be treated effectively with
good surgical techniques with supportive adhesion prevention
products. In my opinion, Seprafilm is currently the best
product available, however, new products are under development
which should be easier to apply and thus more effective.
There is always a risk of adhesion re-formation and the
specific treatment for an individual case should be chosen
by that patient's surgeon. |
| |
Adenomyosis
Diagnosis and Treatment of Adenomyosis
Question:
Dr. Cook, a friend of mine was
talking about a myomectomy for adenomyosis.... to me
that is just not logical...... if they remove part of
the uterus in order to remove the adenomyosis...#1 who's
to say they got it all and #2 if the uterus can no longer
function to have children what's the point in keeping
it? I mean it doesn't produce hormones...but with doctors
in the past doing Hysts left and right is that a valid
reason to keep a diseased organ?
Answer:
This is a good example of a situation that can have
different correct answers dependent upon the patients
circumstances and personal philosophy. To make the correct
decision the patient must have a good understanding
of her situation and the pros and cons of the various
treatment alternatives. With that in mind lets start
with a few definitions.
The shape of the uterus is similar to an upside down
pair (the stem would be coming out of the cervix in
this example). Most of the uterus is made up of smooth
muscle. It's job is to hold the baby during pregnancy
and to push the baby out during delivery. The inside
of the uterus is lined by a thin layer of glands, called
the endometrium, similar to the Teflon lining on cookware.
During pregnancy, the embryo implants into the endometrium,
which provides the necessary nutrients to the developing
embryo until the placenta (afterbirth) develops. The
endometrium thickens up in response to estrogen secretion
the first two weeks of the menstrual cycle. After ovulation
the primary hormone production of the ovaries changes
from estrogen to progesterone. Progesterone helps to
stabilize the endometrium and ready it for implantation.
If pregnancy does not occur, both the estrogen and progesterone
production drop and the endometrium is shed as the woman
has her menses.
Endometriosis is a condition where endometrial tissue
is found outside of the uterus. Adenomyosis is defined
as endometriosis within the muscle wall of the uterus.
Many years ago endometriosis was known as endometriosis
exteri (external to the uterus) and adenomyosis was
known as endometriosis interi (inside of the uterus).
Adenomyosis is usually a result of the endometrium invading
into the muscle wall of the uterus. The adenomyosis
is usually not a discrete lesion, but often sends out
a diffuse network of branching endometrial glands extending
from the endometrium throughout the muscle wall of the
uterus. There is no real beginning and end of these
lesions. If a cross-section of a uterus with adenomyosis
is examined, one will see varying concentrations of
endometriosis with in the muscle. An area with a high
concentration of endometriosis and little remaining
muscle tissue is known as an adenomyoma. A fibroid,
also known as a leiomyoma, is a smooth muscle tumor
in the wall of the uterus. When removed fibroids have
a look similar to a rubber ball. There is a definite
beginning and end to a fibroid.
The most common symptoms of patients with adenomyosis
are painful periods with a very heavy flow and potentially
anemia (low blood count) as a result. A normal uterus
is fairly hard and firm. A uterus with adenomyosis is
usually slightly enlarged and is soft or squishy to
the feel. A careful history and physical exam should
raise the possibility of adenomyosis. A sonogram (ultrasound)
and laparoscopic evaluation may also be helpful in making
the diagnosis. Newer generation MRI's can often identify
adenomyosis. Examination of the surgical specimen under
a microscope is the only method to make an absolute
diagnosis of adenomyosis.
The treatment options for adenomyosis are similar to
those of endometriosis:
1. Observation is an acceptable option if the symptoms
are not severe.
2. Medical treatment includes birth control pills and
GnRH agonists such as Lupron or Synarel. The pills will
lighten the period and thus symptoms. The GnRH agonists
will temporarily alleviate the symptoms and reduce the
size of the adenomyosis. They will not eliminate the
adenomyosis nor prevent continued growth once the GnRH
is discontinued.
3. Conservative surgical treatment with preservation
of the uterus. It is impossible to remove all of the
adenomyosis and preserve the uterus. Removal of fibroids
(a different condition from adenomyosis) and reconstruction
of the uterus during a myomectomy is successful because
fibroids are discrete lesions which can be completely
removed. Small microscopic fibroid "seedlets"
can remain and are one reason fibroids can recur after
a myomectomy. If fibroids do recur after a myomectomy,
it is usually many years later. In contrast the adenomyosis
is so diffuse that an adenomyomectomy (removal of the
adenomyosis with reconstruction of the uterus) will
reduced the amount of adenomyosis present but by the
nature of the lesion a significant amount usually remains
in the uterus. Chances are, the patient will need to
undergo additional surgery within a couple of years.
A woman who is trying to get pregnant or the unusual
case with a single well defined adenomyoma may be candidates
for conservative surgical treatment. Conservative surgical
treatment may also be an acceptable option for a woman
who philosophically does not want a hysterectomy and
does not mind undergoing repeated surgeries to maintain
what is admittedly a diseased organ.
4. Definitive surgical treatment
with hysterectomy. This is the only option to truly
remove or cure the patient of this medical problem.
A patient with adenomyosis can also have endometriosis.
If endometriosis is present it should be treated prior
to actually removing the uterus. The ovaries are responsible
for hormone production and will continue to do so after
a hysterectomy. Having a hysterectomy is never a decision
which should be taken lightly. Too many hysterectomies
have been performed in the past, but others wrongs should
not influence or prevent you from doing what is right
for you. This is a medical condition which, if symptomatic,
will usually require the removal of a diseased organ
(hysterectomy) to obtain relief from the symptoms while
avoiding the real possibility of repetitive surgeries.
return to top
|
| |
Endometriosis; Diagnosis
Classification of Endometriosis
Question:
Dr. Cook, can you please explain
the endometriosis classification system.
Answer:
OVERVIEW OF CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS
First, let's clear up some terminology. Classification
is defined as "arrangement according to some systematic
division into classes or groups". Stage is defined
as "the level or degree in a process of development,
growth or change". The endometriosis classification
system contains four stages (Stage I, Stage II, Stage
III, & Stage IV) of disease severity. The purpose
of a classification system is to identify the relative
the severity of a disease process. The more severe the
disease, the greater the health risk to the patient.
Mild disease would be less serious than severe disease.
The ramifications of increasing disease severity is
obvious when used in staging cancer. The more severe
the stage, the more likely that the disease has spread
and the less likely the patient will survive. Endometriosis
is not a cancer and it does not threaten your physical
survival. Although those of you who have dealt with
endometriosis personally, either yourself or others
in your life, understand the toll it can take on your
life in so many different ways.
The two primary problems women experience with endometriosis
are infertility and pelvic pain. An ideal endometriosis
classification system would determine the severity of
disease based upon the degree of infertility or pelvic
pain and would predict the probability of success of
any given treatment. The difficulty arises in the fact
that we, as a medical profession, do not have a level
of understanding of this disease to know how to measure
these parameters. If we knew exactly how endometriosis
effected fertility, then we could create a test that
would measure the amount of this change. The same goal
applies to endometriosis related pelvic pain. This approach
would determine the severity of endometriosis as it
relates to infertility or pelvic pain.
The current classification system was created with the
goal of predicting a patients future fertility based
on her stage of endometriosis. Unfortunately, at this
time the current endometriosis classification system
does not predict a woman's chance of pregnancy. The
pregnancy rate of a woman treated with Stage IV endometriosis
is the same as a woman treated for Stage I disease.
This classification system was not intended to, nor
is it successful in, predicting the amount of pain a
woman experiences. It does not predict the chance of
pain relief following treatment.
HISTORY OF THE ENDOMETRIOSIS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
Many different endometriosis classification systems
have been proposed since the initial system of Wicks
and Larson (1949), which was based on the microscopic
appearance of endometriosis. In 1951, Huffman proposed
a classification system, similar to the staging system
used for cervical cancer, which was based on the size
and location of the endometrial implants. The current
classification system is, by and large, an evolution
of this Huffman's staging system. During the 1970's
multiple endometriosis classification systems were proposed.
These numerous classification systems led to confusion
and a lack of consensus. This prompted the American
Fertility Society (AFS) to appoint a committee with
representatives from many of the previous classification
systems to create an a uniformly acceptable endometriosis
classification system.
The original AFS classification system was published
in 1979. The stated goal of this classification system
was to predict the chance of conception after treatment
of endometriosis. This classification system was never
intended to predict the amount of pain a patient experienced
as a result of endometriosis, nor the chance of pain
relief after treatment of the endometriosis. The AFS
classification system used a point system for staging
endometriosis. A certain number of points were assigned
in various categories. These categories included the
degree of endometriosis present on the ovaries, peritoneum,
cul-de-sac obliteration, etc. The cumulative number
of points determined the stage (mild, moderate, severe
or extensive) of endometriosis. Dr. John Rock and colleagues
published a couple of studies in the early 1980's which
evaluated the AFS classification system. They felt that
there were two major limitations of this system. They
were concerned that the weighting of the various categories
did not correctly reflect the impact on fertility. Second,
the cutoff points of the total AFS score for each stage
were arbitrarily assigned. It was felt that these factors
limited the ability of the AFS classification system
to predict the chance of pregnancy after treatment of
the endometriosis.
The revised AFS (R-AFS) classification was approved
in 1985. This included changes that attempted to correct
the limitations of the initial classification system.
This is a more detailed system which recognizes the
difference between superficial and invasive disease
and changed the terminology of the four stages to minimal,
mild, moderate and severe. The American Fertility Society
was renamed the American Society for Reproductive Medicine
(ASRM) in 1995. The Endometriosis Classification for
Infertility Subcommittee of the ASRM collected data
from several centers to evaluate the the R-AFS classification
system and pregnancy rates. The study was published
in the May issue of Fertility and Sterility. The authors
concluded that there was no correlation between stage
of endometriosis as determined by the R-AFS classification
system and pregnancy rates. The last sentence of the
article states "At the very least, our results
suggest that fine-grained distinctions between patients
with respect to point scores, although useful for documentation,
are not clinically useful with respect to the prognosis".
(chance of pregnancy) There was data accumulating that
suggested that the appearance of the endometrial implants
might correlated with their biologic activity and thus
pregnancy rates. The additional recommendation of recording
the appearance of the endometrial implants was made
in 1996.
CURRENT ENDOMETRIOSIS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
The "Revised American Society for Reproductive
Medicine Classification of Endometriosis: 1996"
is currently the most widely used system to stage endometriosis.
Figure 1 is the chart of this classification system
produced by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
This is what your physician uses when calculating you
stage of endometriosis. Figure 2 provides examples and
guidelines for use of the classification system. This
material is reprinted by permission from the American
Society for Reproductive Medicine (Fertility and Sterility,
1997, Vol. 67, No. 5, Pages 819 - 820).
Figure 1. Revised American Society for Reproductive
Medicine Classification System: 1996
Reprinted by permission from the American Society for
Reproductive Medicine (Fertility and Sterility, 1997,
Vol. 67, No. 5, Page 819)
Figure 2. Examples and Guidelines for the R-ASRM 1996
Endometriosis Classification System
Reprinted by permission from the American Society for
Reproductive Medicine (Fertility and Sterility, 1997,
Vol. 67, No. 5, Page 820)
This classification system is basically the R-AFS system
based upon the size, location, depth of invasion of
endometrial implants and the amount of scar tissue involving
the ovaries and fallopian tubes. In addition the appearance
of the endometrial implants are classified as red, white
and black. The red lesion category includes red, red-pink
and clear lesions. The white lesion category includes
white, peritoneal defect and yellow- brown lesions.
The black lesion category includes both black and blue
lesions.
Perhaps the addition of the physical appearance of the
endometriotic lesions will help improve the accuracy
of the classification system in predicting the chance
of pregnancy following treatment of endometriosis. The
classification system does not apply to patients with
endometriosis related pain. As the mechanisms by which
endometriosis causes infertility and pain are better
understood, a more refined and useful classification
system will be possible. Until that time, the classification
system provides a means to concisely document the surgical
findings. A video tape of the surgery will provide the
most accurate record and should be included as a part
of the medical record of all patients undergoing laparoscopic
evaluation and treatment. This will allow "re-staging"
of a patient's endometriosis as the current classification
system is refined and future classification systems
are created.
return to top
Diagnosing Endometriosis
I have received a lot of questions recently. In an attempt
to keep up, I will occasionally group similar questions
together.
Question:
#1)
I've been having pain in my lower pelvic region and
my gynecologist has ruled out ovarian cysts through
sonograms, but he doesn't believe that it's endometriosis
because I don't have any lower back pain. Do you think
that I could possibly have endometriosis and need to
have a laparoscopy done?
#2)
Is it possible to miss a diagnosis even after having
laproscopy?
#3)
My wife is suffering from Pelvic pain since June 2000.
She was given Duphaston for 3 month but did not get
relief. Now one doctor is suggesting Nasarel and another
doctor is suggesting operation. I am confused. What
should I do?
#4)
Is there any other method to discover endometriosis
than laparoscopy? How about MRI
Answer:
#1)
Absolutely. The only way to diagnose endometriosis is
during a laparoscopy. Persistent pelvic pain that is
progressive or is interfering with your life, preventing
you from your normal activities, is an indication for
laparoscopic evaluation. A lot of women have endometriosis
without back pain.
#2)
Yes. I have personally seen this situation. When a patient
comes to me with a history of pelvic pain and a "normal"
laparoscope, I will often perform another laparoscopy
to double check (this is where a video tape of the previous
surgery is helpful). I have found that the patients
history of symptoms is more accurate than a previous
laparoscopy. I have performed laparoscopy 6 weeks after
a patient has had "normal" findings at a lapraroscope
by another physician, only to find endometriosis - proven
by pathology report. She either had rapid formation
and growth of endometriosis over a couple of weeks or
the endometriosis was missed at the previous surgery.
#3)
The medications you are referring to function to shut
down estrogen production by the ovaries. This group
of medications can have significant side effects including
bone loss, osteopenia and even osteoporosis. Even if
the decision is made to use these medications, a laparoscopic
diagnosis of endometriosis should be made first. However,
the endometriosis is usually treated at the time of
the laparoscopy, eliminating the need for the use of
this medications and their associated side effects.
#4)
For the most part, no laparoscopy is the method of diagnosing
endometriosis. If there are large volumes of endometriosis,
i.e. larger than 2cm (about 1 inch) then MRI may be
helpful. An endometrioma can be diagnosed with an MRI.
The problem is that the average lesion of endometriosis
is not large enough to be seen with the MRI. In other
words if an MRI shows endometriosis, great, but most
women with endometriosis will have normal MRI findings.
return to top
|
| |
Endometriosis; General
What Causes Endometriosis?
Question:
Dr. Cook what is endometriosis
and what causes it?
Answer:
Endometriosis is defined as the
presence of endometrial tissue outside of the uterus.
The uterus is where the baby grows during pregnancy
and when it is time to deliver, it pushes the baby out.
Most of the uterus is made up of muscle, but it is lined
on the inside by a thin layer of glands called the endometrium.
This thin layer of glands provides the nutritional support
to the developing fetus prior to the development of
the placenta (after-birth). The endometrial lining responds
to the estrogen during the first two weeks of the menstrual
cycle, growing in thickness. You can think of the estrogen
as fertilizer for the endometrial lining. After ovulation,
during the second half of the cycle, the other female
hormone, progesterone, helps to stabilized and mature
the endometrial lining. If the woman is not pregnant,
both the estrogen and progesterone level drop at the
end of the cycle, the endometrial lining sloughs off
and her period starts the next day. The menses are made
up of the endometrial lining, blood and clots. Most
of the menses comes out below, but some flows back up
through the fallopian tubes and inside the body. Endometriosis
is formed when some of this tissue implants and starts
to grow. We don't completely understand why some women
develop endometriosis and others do not. It is probably
related to both the amount of tissue that a woman's
body has to get rid of each month and an inability of
her body to recognize or get rid of the endometrial
tissue inside of the body cavity. The research to date
points to a selective decrease in the immune system.
Several studies as well as our own personal experience
has shown a decrease in the natural killer cell function
(a type of white blood cell).
Retrograde menstruation (backward flow) with implantation
of endometrial tissue, as discussed in the previous
paragraph, is the cause of endometriosis in the vast
majority of cases. Endometrial tissue can spread or
form via other less common mechanisms. Extra pelvic
endometriosis (endometriosis outside of the pelvic cavity)
has been reported in virtually every organ of the body.
Most of these rare endometrial implants formed as a
result of spread of endometrial tissue through the blood
stream (hematogenous spread). Endometriosis has also
been reported in the lymph nodes (e.g. obturator lymph
nodes). Thus lymphatic spread can cause endometriosis.
Endometrial tissue can spread during surgery. The most
common example of surgical spread is endometriosis which
is found in the abdominal wall following a C-Section.
Endometriosis has also been reported in the belly button.
This usually presents with bleeding from the navel with
menses. Finally, endometriosis can form as a result
of what is called coelomic metaplasia. Basically coelomic
cells are those formed as a fetus and metaplasia means
one cell type turns into another cell type. In other
words some of the primitive cells turn into endometriosis
in adult life. This probably accounts for the case of
endometriosis reported in men. All of the men were on
estrogen therapy, I believe for prostatic cancer, which
probably stimulated the transformation of the coelomic
cells into endometriosis. (Ladies please do NOT slip
your significant other a few birth control pills if
he is not understanding of your pain)
In conclusion, endometriosis is the presence of endometrial
tissue outside of the uterus. Back flow of menstrual
tissue through the fallopian tubes with implantation
of endometrial tissue is probably the cause of endometriosis
in the vast majority of cases.
return to top
Endometriosis of the Intestine
(Bowel)
Question:
My doctor did a laparoscopy and found endometriosis
and adhesions throughout my abdominal region. I had
known from the first day after my surgery in March (performed
by my general gyn) that the laparotomy I had was a total
failure and Dr. X was able to confirm that after this
surgery. Both of my ovaries were attached to my uterus
and my right ovary and ureter was also attached to the
uterus. My right ovary was very diseased and had to
be removed along with the right tube. Endometriosis
was found all over the small bowel and Dr. X was not
able to remove that. He is recommending that I find
a general surgeon somewhere who specializes in surgery
of the bowel. He feels that a bowel resection will be
necessary. Are you or any of the other physicians at
Athena skilled in performing that type of operation?
This is a very scary thing for me to comprehend right
now and I will probably seek whatever alternatives are
available to me before choosing surgery again. However,
I have been through many of the treatments such as continuous
birth control and Lupron. The only thing that Lupron
helped me with was temporary relief of my bowel symptoms
last year, but they eventually came back while still
on the injections. Is there anything that you can recommend
for me at this point?
Answer:
First, I am glad that you persisted and listened to
your body and kept going until you found someone who
could help you. I am sorry though that at the end of
your most recent surgery you have still not gotten your
problem fixed and you are now faced with yet another
surgery.
BOWEL ANATOMY 101
The intestines (bowel) are made up of two basic parts,
the small intestine and the large intestine. The small
intestine is about 9 feet long and the large intestine
is about 3.5 feet long. The small intestine connects
the stomach to the large intestine. The small intestine
fills the area from the from the bottom of the ribs
to the top of the uterus. It has no set course and looks
a bit like a bunch a spaghetti. The large intestine
connects the small intestine to the anus. From the anus
the large intestine follows a course behind the vagina,
cervix and uterus, and makes an upside down "U",
up the left side of the body, across the upper abdomen
just below the ribs and down the right side of the abdomen
ending near the hip bone on the right. The appendix
is a small worm like structure projecting off of the
large intestine close to where the large and small bowel
connect. The contents of the small bowel are primarily
liquid while those of the large bowel are primarily
solid. The bowel wall is made up of three basic layers;
(1) the serosa, (2) the muscle wall and (3) the mucosa.
The serosa is outside lining of the bowel wall. It is
very thin, similar to saran wrap. Most of the bowel
wall is made up of muscle. This is the middle layer.
The inside lining of the bowel is called the mucosa
and is also quite thin.
ENDOMETRIOSIS OF THE BOWEL
Endometriosis has been reported to grow in almost every
organ in the body outside of the reproductive organs.
The bowel is the most common non reproductive organ
involved with endometriosis.
INVASION
The degree of invasion of the bowel wall by endometriosis
is one factor that will determine the type of symptoms
that the patient will experience. If the bowel endometriosis
is superficial, involving only the outside serosal surface,
the most common symptoms are bloating, nausea and loose
stools with menses. At the other extreme, if the endometriosis
has invaded all the way through the bowel wall including
the inside mucosa, then the patient will usually experience
rectal bleeding with her period. While it is common
for the endometriosis to invade through the outside
serosa and the middle muscle wall, it is unusual to
invade through the inner mucosal layer. This probably
accounts for the high failure rate of barium enemas
and colonoscopsies in diagnosing bowel endometriosis.
The location of the bowel will be the primary determining
factor of the type of symptoms when the muscle wall
of the bowel is involved with endometriosis.
LARGE BOWEL
The pelvic portion of the large bowel (the rectum and
the sigmoid colon) is the most commonly involved part
of the intestine. The close proximity of this portion
of the bowel to the vagina and cervix often results
in painful intercourse. Bowl movements can also be very
painful since the bowel contents are solid in this portion
of the bowel. The portion of the intestine where the
large and small bowel connect is located in the area
between the belly button and the right hip bone. This
is in the same area as the appendix. Involvement of
the bowel in this area or the appendix can result in
right sided pain. Bowel endometriosis can also result
in adhesions (scar tissue). These adhesions can involve
other loops of bowel resulting in a partial obstruction
(blockage), the ovary, fallopian tube or even the ureter.
These adhesions can also result in pain. Endometriosis
of the large bowel rarely results in obstruction of
the bowel.
SMALL BOWEL
Endometriosis of the small bowel usually results in
bloating and pain which is associated with eating. Often
patients with small bowel endometriosis have restricted
the amount and type of foods that they eat. The symptoms
are slowly progressive over time and the patient may
not even realize the extent to which she has altered
her diet. Small bowel endometriosis often results in
a partial bowel obstruction. As the bowel swells following
a meal the bowel kinks, and like a kinked garden hose
the contents do not get through until enough pressure
builds up to push by the narrowed portion.
TREATMENT OF BOWEL ENDOMETRIOSIS
All of my patients undergoing surgery have a preoperative
bowel preparation. It is impossible to tell preoperatively
if bowel endometriosis is present. The laser laparoscope
is a wonderful surgical instrument for treating bowel
endometriosis. This combination provides the magnification
and precision necessary for me to remove the endometriosis
from the bowel, without having to perform a bowel resection
in the vast majority of cases. Situations in which the
crude electrosurgery would result in the need for bowel
resection are easily handled by laparoscopic laser surgery.
This is true for both the large and small bowel. In
the rare cases that the endometriosis has completely
replaced a section of bowel, the diseased segment of
bowel is removed by one of the bowel surgeons of my
team and the normal ends of the bowel are reconnected.
THE TEAM APPROACH TO THE TREATMENT OF ENDOMETRIOSIS
Endometriosis is a dreaded disease which has no respect
for the boundaries of the various medical subspecialties.
This is why it is so important to use a team approach
in the treatment of individuals with endometriosis.
For example: The urologist may help if the endometriosis
involves the bladder or the bowel surgeon may help if
the bowel is involved or the thoracic surgeon may help
if a thoracoscopy is needed to diagnose and treat endometriosis
of the lung. Proper preoperative evaluation and preparation
in conjunction with the team approach should result
in the complete treatment of the individual with endometriosis.
NON SURGICAL TREATMENT OF BOWEL ENDOMETRIOSIS
At this point in time there is no non surgical treatment
of bowel endometriosis. Lupron, birth control pills
etc, may slow the growth of endometriosis, but they
will not get rid of the endometriosis nor the associated
fibrosis or adhesions. Invasive bowel endometriosis
is a serious condition which can lead to an acute surgical
emergency (bowel obstruction).
CONCLUSION
In summary, you probably are looking at another surgery
to treat the endometriosis of your intestine. Using
laser treatment, the vast majority of bowel endometriosis
can be treated without having to perform a bowel resection.
Yes, at Athena we are skilled in treating bowel endometriosis.
I hope we have the opportunity to help you feel better!
return to top
Peritoneal Pockets
Question:
What is a peritoneal pocket and what possible effect
can it have on fertility. My doctor found two of said
"pockets" but saw no endometriosis.
Answer:
Peritoneal pockets should be considered endometriosis
until proven otherwise. Peritoneum covers the inside
of the body much like the skin covers the outside of
the body. Peritoneum normally has the appearance of
saran wrap. It is stretched over the organs resulting
in a flat contour. Peritoneal pockets can be of varying
depths, ranging from slight indentations to very deep
narrow pockets.
Peritoneal pockets are also
referred to as Allen Masters Syndrome. Dr. Allen and
Dr. Masters published an article back in 1955 titled
"Traumatic laceration of uterine support".
They felt that the trauma of pregnancy caused peritoneal
pockets which resulted in pain and abnormal vaginal
bleeding. De Brux published a report in 1968 documenting
endometriosis in half of the peritoneal pockets he studied.
Dr. Donald Chatman then followed up in 1981 with a larger
study which noted 68% of peritoneal pockets with endometriosis
and an even larger study five years later showing endometriosis
in 79% of peritoneal pockets. Thus endometriosis is
associated with peritoneal pockets in the majority of
cases.
In its mild form peritoneal pockets can result in minor
changes in the contour of the pelvic peritoneum. On
occasion this is the only appearance of endometriosis.
The surgeon must have a good understanding of the normal
contour of the pelvic peritoneum and a high index of
suspicion that this mild variation in contour alone
can truly represent endometriosis. Deep pockets can
be missed if a systematic approach is not used to literally
explore every nook and cranny. If a deep pocket is found
the base of the pocket should be grasp with a locking
instrument. This identifies the base of the pocket during
the dissection process. If this is not done portions
of the peritoneum can easily be lost during the dissection
and removal. If some of the peritoneum lining the pocket
which contains endometriosis is left behind this can
result in recurrent endometriosis.
To answer your specific question, statistically, your
doctor probably did see endometriosis. Since peritoneal
pockets usually are endometriosis, this finding can
have the same effect on fertility as endometriosis.
return to top
Updated August 22, 2002
Endometriosis of the Lung
Question:
I've been told that endometriosis can spread outside
of the pelvic area and I even heard of a woman with
endometriosis who's lung collapsed every time she had
a period. Can endometriosis really spread to the lungs?
Answer:
Yes, while it is rare, endometriosis can grow in the
lung. This is also known as thoracic endometriosis.
There are two basic types of thoracic endometriosis.
Thoracic endometriosis can be divided into pleural endometriosis
(the lining of the lung) and parenchymal endometriosis
(the lung itself). The majority of cases of pulmonary
endometriosis occur in the pleura rather than the lung
itself (about 5:1 - pleura:parenchyma).
PLEURAL ENDOMETRIOSIS:
The vast majority of patients with pleural endometriosis
experience difficulty breathing (shortness of breath),
pain, and pneumothorax (collapsed lung) or pleural effusion
(water on the lung). Over 90% of cases are right sided.
It is not uncommon to find small holes in the diaphragm.
The majority of patients with pleural endometriosis
also have pelvic endometriosis, raising the question
if spread of the endometriosis is via the small holes
in the diaphragm.
PARENCHYMAL ENDOMETRIOSIS:
Most patients with parenchymal endometriosis cough up
blood but few have difficulty breathing or pain. Few
of these patients have pelvic endometriosis but usually
have a history of pelvic surgery or vaginal delivery.
The theory is that the endometrial cells spread through
the blood vessels as emboli.
TREATMENT OF THORACIC ENDOMETRIOSIS:
In the past diagnosis of thoracic endometriosis has
been difficult and treatment often involved either medical
suppression of the endometriosis (e.g. danazol or GnRH
agonists) or surgery in the form of a thoracotomy (big
incision between the ribs) and obliteration of the pleural
space (in order to prevent the lung from collapsing)
without actually diagnosing or removing the endometriosis.
The patient's history plays a key role in the diagnosis
of thoracic endometriosis. Traditionally a chest x-ray
or ventilation/perfusion study (a study which looks
at both the air flow and blood flow through the lung)
have helped in the diagnosis of endometriosis. MRI's
have now advanced to the point that they can help locate
and diagnose endometriosis. Thoracoscopy (laparoscopy
of the thorax/pleural space) can help diagnose and treat
pleural endometriosis (greater than 80% of thoracic
endometriosis). Normally, when a patient undergoes general
anesthesia, a breathing tube is placed through her mouth
and down the bronchus and placed on a ventilator during
the surgery. This tube is removed as she wakes up. To
perform a thoracoscopy, a special double lumen breathing
tube is placed through the patient's mouth, with one
tube in the right lung and one tube in the left lung.
At rest a person can easily get all the air they need
through one lung. The side which contains the endometriosis,
lets say the right, is collapsed by blocking off the
tube on that side and the patient is ventilated (breaths)
through the open tube, the left lung in this case. The
collapsed lung opens up the pleural space and the thorascope
is introduced into the pleural space. The pleural cavity
is inspected and any endometriosis, scarring or fibrosis
is removed. The thorascope is then removed and the incision
is closed and the lung is re-inflated. Laparoscopy should
also be performed to look for endometriosis in the pelvis,
abdominal cavity, diaphragm, etc.
return to top
Endometriosis and Tampons
Question:
Dr. Cook, is it true that tampons cause endometriosis?
Answer:
There are concerns that chemicals (dioxin) in tampons
may increase a woman's risk of developing endometriosis.
Medical studies that would provide a definitive answer
to this question have not been performed. No difference
was observed in the few studies that have looked at
the incidence of endometriosis in tampon users and nonusers.
The Tampon Safety and Research Act of 1997 (H.R. 2900),
introduced by Congresswoman Carolyn B. Maloney November
7, 1997, would provide the necessary research to investigate
this issue.
The primary concern, regarding tampon use and endometriosis,
is presence of dioxin in tampons. Rayon, a synthetic
fiber, is very absorbent and is used in most tampons.
Chlorine is used to bleach the rayon during the manufacturing
process to give the tampons a "clean" white
appearance. The chlorine bleaching process used in the
production of the majority of tampons reportedly produces
a toxic byproduct known as dioxin. Proctor & Gamble,
the makers of Tampax, state the chlorine bleaching process
does not produce detectable levels of dioxin. Dioxin
(TCDD; 2,3,7,8-tetracholorodibenzo-p-dioxin) is thought
to be toxic at very low doses. Dioxin is also a byproduct
of pesticide production and PVC (polyvinyl chloride)
pipes. Studies have suggested links between dioxin and
cancer, behavioral effects and learning disorders, decreased
male sex hormone, diabetes, immune system toxicity,
sperm loss and endometriosis
Several studies have looked at the relationship between
endometriosis and dioxin. Reir et. al. published a study
in 1993 and again in 1995 documenting an increased incidence
of endometriosis in rhesus monkeys following exposure
to dioxin. The monkeys were exposed to dioxin over a
period of 4 years. Ten years later they underwent laparoscopic
evaluation for endometriosis. There were three groups
of monkeys in this study; a control group (no exposure
to dioxin), a low dose group (5 ppt dioxin) and a high
dose group (25ppt of dioxin). Thirty three percent of
the monkeys in the control group had endometriosis,
but none with moderate or severe endometriosis. The
incidence of moderate to severe endometriosis was 43%
in the low dose dioxin group, and 71% in the high dose
dioxin group. There was clearly an increase incidence
of endometriosis with exposure to dioxin and an increased
severity with the dose of dioxin. An Israel study published
in 1997 evaluates the potential association of dioxin
and endometriosis in infertile women. The study group
was comprised of infertile women with endometriosis
and the control group was infertile women without endometriosis.
Eighteen percent of women in the endometriosis group
tested positive for dioxin while only 3% were positive
for dioxin in the non-endometriosis group. However,
in contrast to the monkey study, the concentration of
dioxin did not correlate with the severity of endometriosis.
Lamb and Berg published a study in 1985 examining the
potential role of tampons in women with endometriosis.
The rate of tampon use in 470 women with endometriosis
(82%) was compared to that of the general population
(75 to 83%). While there was no statistical difference
in the rate of tampon use in this study, the age at
initial tampon use was statistically earlier in the
endometriosis group. In a 1993 case control study, Darrow
et. Al. compared tampon use in 104 women with laparoscopically
confirmed endometriosis to 100 friends of the patients.
Compared to their friends, women with endometriosis
under the age of 30 were, on average, 3.6 times as likely
to have a history of tampon use of greater than or equal
to 14 years.
As is evident from the above paragraph, the medical
literature is pretty weak when it comes to the issue
of endometriosis and tampon use. There is also the theoretical
concern of tampons increasing the resistance of outflow
of the menstrual fluid that could result in an increase
in the amount of retrograde menstruation. As I have
discussed previously, the leading theory of the cause
of endometriosis is retrograde menstruation. A lot of
women use tampons and thus a definitive answer is needed
to the question of tampon use and the possible increased
risk of endometriosis. A bill has been submitted in
congress to help promote medical research to answer
this question.
The Tampon Safety and Research Act of 1977; "A
bill to provide for research to determine the extent
to which the presence of dioxin, synthetic fibers, and
other additives in tampons and similar products used
by women with respect to menstruation pose any risks
to the health of women, including risks relating to
cervical cancer endometriosis, infertility, ovarian
cancer, breast cancer, immune system deficiencies, pelvic
inflammatory disease, and toxic shock syndrome, and
for other purposes" was introduced by Representative
Carolyn Maloney, 11/07/97. This bill was referred to
the subcommittee on Health and Environment November
14, 1997 where it remains to this day.
In Summary, the chlorine bleaching process traditionally
used in the production of tampons creates dioxin. Many
health problems including endometriosis have been linked
to low dose dioxin exposure. The presence of dioxin
in tampons may pose a health risk, but the degree and
significance of this risk is unknown. Dioxin is concentrated
in fat tissue and thus is found in food sources such
as red meat and fish. Elimination of dioxin from tampons
may be beneficial to your health but will not eliminate
your exposure to this chemical. Until the necessary
medical studies are available, such as those proposed
in the Tampon Safety and Research Act of 1977, the medical
community will not be able to provide you with hard
facts. Feminine pads are an alternative to tampons.
While most pads are bleached with chlorine and may result
in dioxin production, this product is placed on the
outside of the body and thus reduces your exposure.
If you decide to use tampons, you will have to weigh
the evidence and decide for yourself whether you are
comfortable using traditional tampons or would prefer
to use natural tampons.
Dioxin free tampons are available. If you feel more
comfortable using an unbleached tampon, I have included
some links and phone numbers that you might find helpful.
I have no association with any of the companies listed
nor am I endorsing any of their products.
Natural Tampons
Terra Femme Tampons
Tampax Naturals
Glad Rags 800-700-4523
Natracare 800-796-2872
return to top
Is there any connection
between IUD use and endometriosis?
Question:
Is there any connection between IUD use and endometriosis?
Does the IUD worsen or contribute to it in any way?
Answer:
IUD use may increase the risk of developing endometriosis.
We know that heavier menstrual flow is associated with
an increased risk of developing endometriosis. Intrauterine
devices increase the menstrual flow and thus we presume,
retrograde menstruation. Several studies have looked
at the possible association between IUD use and endometriosis.
The most recent article was a U.S. study published in
1995. This was a case control study of 3384 women undergoing
laparoscopy for tubal sterilization. 126 patients had
endometriosis. 504 patients without endometriosis were
randomly selected from the group. Long duration of IUD
use was associated with an odds ratio of 3.0. Therefore
this study demonstrated an increased incidence of endometriosis
in patients with history of IUD use.
A Chinese study was published in 1994 which did not
support the relationship between IUD use and endometriosis.
This was a case control study of 203 women with endometriosis.
A study out of Italy in the same year showed a relative
risk of 1.3 for ever users of IUD compared to never
users of IUD. A review article was published by Italian
authors in 1993. Most of the previous studies reviewed
demonstrated either an increased risk of endometriosis
with IUD use or no effect. Two previous articles demonstrated
a lower risk of endometriosis in previous users of the
IUD.
A British study followed 17, 032 women for up to 23
years. This study showed a decrease risk of endometriosis
in current users of IUD (relative risk of 0.4) and an
increased risk (relative risk of 1.4) in IUD users 49
to 72 months previously compared with never users of
IUD
Finally a 1975 article reported a case of endometriosis
of the omentum following perforation of the uterus by
a Lippes Loop.
In Summary, IUD use probably results in a slight increase
risk of endometriosis. This is but one of many potential
side effects which should be considered prior to choosing
to use the IUD as a method of contraception. Patients
with a known history of endometriosis may be better
served by another form of contraception.
[return to top
Ovarian Cysts
Question:
I had a CT scan done and it turns out I have a huge
cyst on my right ovary. It appears to be the same as
the one that was on my left ovary that my doctor removed
during surgery three weeks ago. It is 5cm big, and what
worries me is that it wasn't there during surgery three
weeks ago. My doctor thinks it might me an endometrioma.
Can you tell me more about ovarian cysts.
Answer:
If this cyst was not present three weeks ago, the chances
of this being an endometrioma is almost zero. Let's
review the basic types of ovarian cysts (not including
pregnancy cysts). These include (1) functional cysts,
(2) endometriomas, (3) benign ovarian cystic tumors
and (4) malignant ovarian tumors. Other structures which
can be mistaken for ovarian cysts include paratubal
cysts (not uncommon, usually not harmful), hydosalpinx
(water in blocked tubes) and peritoneal inclusion cysts
(cystic pockets of the inside lining of the body).
FUNCTIONAL CYSTS
Functional cysts include the developing follicular cyst,
the hemorrhagic corpus luteum cyst and the unrupture
follicular cyst (also called a simple cyst). The developing
follicular cyst is found in the ovary during the first
two weeks of the menstrual cycle. This is the egg sac,
including the egg, the support cells and the surrounding
fluid. Normally these cysts enlarge to about one inch.
The egg is then released during ovulation and the cystic
fluid drains out of the ovary and thus the cyst goes
away. This cycle of events happens almost every month
in a woman with normal menstrual cycles. These cysts
rarely cause pain unless the ovary is surrounded by
adhesions (scar tissue). A hemorrhagic corpus luteum
cyst forms when the egg breaks a small blood vessel
in the ovary during ovulation. The broken blood vessel
can bleed into the ovary and develop a blood clot or
what is medically called a hemorrhagic corpus luteum
cyst. This type of cyst can get pretty big and has an
appearance similar to an endometrioma. A hemorrhagic
corpus luteum cyst will appear suddenly and the body
will reabsorb it over a month or two. The only way an
endometrioma will disappear on a sonogram, other than
surgery, is if it ruptures. Once in a while the developing
egg is not released resulting in an unruptured follicular
cyst. Ovulation does not occur. This condition probably
occurs in most women once in a blue moon (the second
full moon occurring in the same month). Unruptured follicular
cysts occur more often when the ovary is surrounded
by adhesions (it is more difficult for the egg to escape
from the ovary) and is probably more common the first
month after pelvic surgery since the hormone production
fluctuates with the stress of surgery. Some women are
genetically predisposed to developing this type of cyst.
Some physicians believe this is one cause of fertility
and is called luteunized unruptured follicular (LUF)
syndrome in women who repeated do not release the egg.
The majority of the time follicular cysts will eventually
resolve on their own.
ENDOMETRIOMAS
An endometrioma is a cyst in the ovary lined by endometriosis.
As the endometriosis grows and sheds every month, the
chocolate fluid accumulates and the cysts grows. This
type of cyst can be devastating to a woman's reproductive
function. If left to grow it will tend to progressively
destroy normal ovarian tissue. If it gets large enough
or if trauma occurs (e.g. dog jumping on your lap or
intercourse) the endometrioma can rupture and the contents
spill into the pelvic cavity. The chocolate contents
are very irritating to the body and can result in extensive
adhesion formation, including damage to the fallopian
tubes which is irreversible. Lupron does not treat endometriomas.
If endometriomas are drained surgically they will recur.
The surgeon must remove the entire lining of the endometrioma
to eliminate the chance of that endometrioma recurring
(it is possible for a new one to form). If a surgeon
coagulates or laser vaporizes the lining of the endometrioma,
removal of the lining is usually incomplete and it is
only a matter of time before it fills back up.
BENIGN OVARIAN TUMORS
There are many types of benign ovarian tumors including
dermoid cysts. Discussion of the various types of benign
tumors is beyond the scope of this discussion. Suffice
it to say, if you have a cyst that is present on your
ovary and it doesn't go away after a couple of months,
it should be investigated.
MALIGNANT OVARIAN TUMORS
Malignant ovarian tumors are cancer. These are more
common in older women but are found in all age groups,
including teenagers. Some of you have heard that endometriosis
can turn into cancer. It is possible and I have seen
a couple of cases in my career. But, I would like to
emphasize that this is very rare. The important point
is not to ignore an abnormal finding.
return to top
Uterus Tipped to the Side
Question:
I have endometriosis and I am hoping that you might
be able to provide me with some insight. I recently
had a trans vaginal ultrasound done, the results came
out with the following. My uterus,(which has always
been tipped) is now not only tipped but it has moved
to my left side, which is causing pain and a great deal
of pelvic pressure. What causes this to happen? What,
if anything can be done to move it back into place?
Answer:
In a patient with endometriosis, a uterus which is tipped
to the side is often a sign of uterosacral ligament
involvement with endometriosis. These ligaments (one
on the right and one on the left) are low in the pelvis
connecting the lower uterus to the lower back. They
are also near the bowel and the top of the vagina. Because
of their location, they often cause pain in the lower
back, pain with deep penetration with intercourse and
can cause bowel symptoms when involved with endometriosis.
As these ligaments become involved with endometriosis
they become scarred and shortened. If the left uterosacral
ligament is involved more than the right it will tend
to pull the uterus to the patients left. You may also
notice leg pain, probably more on the left than the
right. As the nerves coarse from the spine to the leg
they pass through the pelvis. Endometriosis involving
these nerves in the pelvis can result in pain radiating
down the leg(s). Complete removal of the endometriosis
will usually result in the uterus returning to the correct
position and resolution of the associated symptoms.
return to top
Endometriosis after Pregnancy
Question:
Is it true if you have had a child you can not have
endometriosis? My doctor blows me off when I suggest
endo as the reason for my chronic pelvic pain, she said
you can't have it if you have had a child.
Answer:
No, this is not true. Some, but not all women, will
have a decrease in symptoms following pregnancy. Unfortunately,
even for women who do have a decrease in symptoms after
pregnancy it is temporary. The notion that pregnancy
cures endometriosis is an old wives tale. If a physician
believes this then they are obviously not well informed
about endometriosis and you may want to seek out another
physician who is better informed.
If a woman does experience relief with pregnancy, breast
feeding usually helps prolong the return of the symptoms.
A woman usually does not have return of periods if breast
feeding is the only source of food for the infant. The
lack of periods usually helps to minimize the symptoms
of endometriosis. Chronic pelvic pain whether before
or after child birth warrants, evaluation and treatment.
return to top
|
| |
|
| |
Endometriosis; Infertility
Does Endometriosis Increase the
Risk of Miscarriage?
Question:
Is there a higher miscarriage
rate in women with endometriosis who conceive? At what
stage of your pregnancy can you regard yourself as safe
from miscarriage. Are there any tests that can or should
be performed during the high risk phase?
Answer:
We do not have a definite answer
to the question "does endometriosis cause an increase
in the miscarriage rate". Some physicians in the
infertility field do feel there is an increase in the
risk of miscarriage with endometriosis. Some feel there
is no increase in the miscarriage rate. The reason we
do not have a definite answer to this question, is that
there are problems with the studies examining this issue.
The most recent edition of the widely read textbook
Clinical Gynecologic Endocrinology and Infertility states
"In appropriately controlled studies the [miscarriage]
rate was in the normal range in women with endometriosis
who were not treated, and it is likely that previous
studies were flawed by their choice of control [miscarriage]
rates". In English what this means is that many
of the earlier studies used historical controls. That
is, the study looked at the miscarriage rates in patients
prior to treatment of endometriosis compared to the
miscarriage rates in the same patients after treatment
of endometriosis. In these studies patients had lower
miscarriage rates after treatment. One of the best studies
was published back in 1986. In this study, half of the
patients with endometriosis were treated surgically
and the other half was not treated (either surgically
or medically). Both the treated and untreated groups
showed a significant decrease in the miscarriage rate.
The miscarriage rate in the treated group was also significantly
lower than the untreated group. Unfortunately, no study
has been published which prospectively looks at two
identical groups of women, with the exception of endo
verses no endo, and followed their miscarriage rate.
The vast majority of miscarriages occur within the first
three months of pregnancy. It is rare to have problems
later than 10-12 weeks, but it possible. You are not
entirely safe from "miscarriage" until the
baby is in your hands after delivery.
I use the following approach with my patients during
the first trimester, which can be considered the high
risk phase. After a positive pregnancy test, I usually
obtain what is called a quantitative beta hCG. This
is a blood test that tells you the exact level of pregnancy
hormone present. If the pregnancy is developing normally,
the level should nearly double every other day. I usually
perform a transvaginal sonogram (ultrasound) once the
level beta hCG gets up in the range of about 3,000 .
At this point a gestational sac should be visible inside
the uterus in a normal pregnancy (some older sonogram
machines may require a level of 6,000 to see a gestational
sac). Two weeks later, usually about eight weeks from
the last period, a repeat sonogram should demonstrate
a fetus and heartbeat in a normal pregnancy. If everything
looks OK at this point your chances are very good that
that your pregnancy will continue and its time to pop
open your non-alcoholic champagne. At a later time your
OB will perform the routine tests for neural tube defects,
diabetes, etc.
If the beta hCG level is not rising appropriately or
if no gestational sac is seen as described above, then
an ectopic (tubal) pregnancy must be considered and
managed appropriately.
return
to top
Endometriosis;
Pelvic Pain
Can Endometriosis be confused
with PID?
Question:
Can endometriosis be confused with Pelvic Inflammatory
Disease?
Answer:
Yes it is a possibility. Endometriosis
and pelvic inflammatory disease can both cause pelvic
pain. Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) is a condition
in which the fallopian tubes become infected, usually
with chlamydia or a bacterial infection, including gonorrhea.
There is no association between PID and endometriosis.
While it is important to consider PID in the differential
diagnosis of a patient with pelvic pain, all too often
this is the assumed diagnosis in emergency rooms, especially
in young single women. I would guess that a significant
number of you with endometriosis have been told at one
time or another that you have PID.
A person with PID usual | | | |